This chapter
demonstrated various approaches to analyzing the firm’s internal environment.
Differentiate
among a firm’s resources, capabilities, core competencies, and activities.
Core
competencies are unique, deeply embedded, firm-specific strengths that
allow companies to differentiate their products and services and thus create more value for
customers than their rivals, or offer products and services of acceptable value at lower cost.
Resources are any assets that a company
can draw on
when crafting and executing strategy.
Capabilities are the organizational and
managerial skills necessary to orchestrate a diverse set of resources to deploy them strategically.
Activities are distinct and fine-grained
business processes
that enable firms to add incremental value by transforming input into goods and services.
The compare and contrast tangible and intangible resources.
Tangible
resources have physical attributes and are visible.
Intangible resources have no physical
attributes and
are invisible.
Competitive
advantage is more likely to be based on intangible resources.
Evaluate the
two critical assumptions behind the resource-based view.
The first critical
assumption—resource heterogeneity—is that bundles of
resources, capabilities,
and competencies
differ across firms.
The resource bundles of firms competing in the same industry (or even the same strategic group) are unique to some
extent and thus differ from one another.
The
second critical assumption—resource immobility—is that resources tend to be “sticky” and don’t move easily from firm to firm.
Because of
that stickiness, the resource differences that exist between firms are difficult to
replicate and, therefore,
can last for a long time.
Applying the
VRIO framework to assess the competitive implications of a firm’s resources.
For a firm’s resource
to be the basis of a competitive advantage, it must have VRIO attributes: valuable (V), rare (R), and costly to imitate (I). The firm must also be able to
organize (O) in order to capture the value of the resource.
A
resource is valuable (V) if it allows the firm to take advantage of an external opportunity
and/or neutralize
an external threat.
A
resource is rare (R) if the number of firms that possess it is less than the number
of firms it
would require
to reach a state of perfect competition.
A
resource is costly to imitate (I) if firms that do not possess the resource are unable to
develop or buy
the resource
at a comparable cost.
The
firm is organized (O) to capture the value of the resource if it has an effective
organizational structure,
processes, and systems in place to fully exploit the competitive potential.
Evaluate
different conditions that allow firms to sustain their competitive advantage.
Several conditions
make it costly for competitors to imitate the resources, capabilities, or competencies that underlie a firm’s competitive
advantage: (1) better expectations of future resource value (or simply
luck), (2) path dependence, (3) causal ambiguity, and (4) social complexity.
These
barriers to imitation are isolating mechanisms because they prevent
rivals from competing away the advantage a firm may enjoy.
How dynamic
capabilities can help a firm sustain competitive advantage.
To sustain a
competitive advantage, any fit between a firm’s internal strengths and the external environment must be dynamic.
Dynamic capabilities allow a firm to
create, deploy,
modify, reconfigure, or upgrade its resource base to gain and sustain competitive advantage in a constantly changing environment.
Apply a value
chain analysis to understand which of the firm’s activities in the process of
transforming inputs into
outputs generate differentiation and which drive costs.
The value chain
describes the internal activities a firm engages in when transforming inputs into outputs.
Each
activity the firm performs along the horizontal chain adds incremental value
and incremental costs.
A
careful analysis of the value chain allows managers to obtain a more detailed
and fine-grained understanding
of how the firm’s economic value created breaks down into a distinct set of activities that help determine perceived
value and the costs
to create it.
When
a firm’s set of distinct activities is able to generate value greater than the costs to
create it, the
firm obtains a profit margin (assuming the market price the firm is able to command
exceeds the
costs of value creation).
Conduct a SWOT
analysis to combine external and internal analysis and derive strategic
implications.
Formulating a strategy
that increases the chances of gaining and sustaining a competitive advantage is based on synthesizing
insights obtained from an internal analysis of the company’s strengths (S) and weaknesses (W) with
those from an analysis of external opportunities (O) and threats (T).
The
strategic implications of a SWOT analysis should help the firm to leverage its
internal strengths
to exploit
external opportunities, while mitigating internal weaknesses and external threats.
Comments
Post a Comment