Labour
markets are often seen as arenas of competition in which forces of supply and
demand determine wage and employment levels. In reality, however, there
are limits to competition in labour markets.
Employers have some freedom to make a strategic choice between
internalising or externalising the employment relationship.
Their choices are influenced, although not entirely determined, by the nature of
their labour requirements and by features of the labour market context
in which they operate.
The aggregate supply of labour – the size of the workforce – is
determined by demographic factors such as the
size and age structure of the population and by social factors, policy
direction and a range of political factors
that influence the participation rate of different socioeconomic groups within
the population. In the UK, differential participation rates can be observed
between men and women of different age groups
and different ethnic groups. The interplay of social
factors such as age, gender, ethnicity, disability
and class affects the employment rates of people in ways that are complex and
difficult to unravel.
Aggregate labour demand consists of total employment plus
unfilled vacancies. The demand for labour is derived
from the demand for goods and services. In conditions of low unemployment –
tight labour markets – employers have to compete more actively to attract and
retain workers. When labour markets are ‘loose’, labour is in plentiful
supply and the cost of labour is consequently
driven down.
The demand for labour comprises jobs of varying quality. Unfair
discrimination operating within labour markets
often means that women and ethnic minorities are disadvantaged in terms
of access to good jobs.
There has been a long-term change in labour demand away from
manufacturing to services. This has been an
important force driving the long-term growth of part-time employment and women’s
employment. While this has boosted the employment rates of women, the quality of
jobs on offer is invariably poor, offering poor pay and poor prospects for promotion.
Since the 1980s, there has been a shift in the occupational
structure of labour demand mainly towards highly
skilled occupations but also leading to the growth of some low-skilled
occupations. There has been a relative decline in
intermediate occupations. Some refer to this as the ‘hollowing’
out of the occupational structure to create an hourglass economy.
Contrary to what might have been predicted from the overall
trend towards more highly skilled work, the quality of
jobs has deteriorated in terms of work intensification and worker autonomy,
although not (up until recently) in terms of job stability. The demand for better
work–life balance is a recent response to growing work pressure and most
employers appear now to be recognising the
business case for offering work–life balance
provisions.
Comments
Post a Comment