The
topic of employee voice comprises three distinct but related concepts: employee involvement,
employee participation and industrial democracy. The difference between these
constructs is best understood in terms of variations in
employee power and influence. Broadly speaking, there is a continuum
ranging from narrow task-based employee input (employee
involvement) through to elements of co-determination
or joint decisionmaking (participation), extending to full-blown employee
ownership (industrial democracy).
The topic of voice has a long history. Interestingly, while
employee involvement is nowadays ascendant, this is a
relatively recent phenomenon. In the past, the field has been dominated by
the themes of participation and industrial democracy. The current hegemony of
employee involvement can be tracked to the 1980s and the emergence of
neo-liberalism and various influential HRM
models. While employee involvement is currently ascendant, developments at
EU level have served to bolster the flagging fortunes of employee
participation. The European Works Council and Information and Consultation
Directives provide employees with statutory rights to
consultation hitherto denied to British workers. Academic commentators, however,
have expressed reservations as to whether the legislation has the potential to
seriously challenge managerial prerogative.
Empirical research thus indicates a trend towards employee
involvement and a decline in representative
participation. An outcome of this trend is that large swathes of the British workforce
are not covered by trade union representation. There is
concern that a ‘representation gap’ has opened up and that such workers
lack ‘voice’ and the ability to influence workplace decisions.
There has been some experimentation with non-union forms of
collective voice (NERs). Evidence suggests that such structures
are managerial creations that lack power and autonomy. One
corollary is that pluralist commentators argue these are a wholly ineffective
substitute for independent trade union voice. Such structures may,
however, be compatible with HRM given its unitary
underpinnings.
Comments
Post a Comment