This chapter discussed
two generic business-level strategies (differentiation and cost leadership);
some factors
that companies can use to drive those strategies; integration strategy, the
attempt to find a competitive
advantage by reconciling the trade-offs between the two generic business
strategies; and the dynamics of competitive positioning.
Definition
business-level strategy and how it determines a firm’s strategic position.
Business-level
strategy determines a firm’s strategic position in its quest for competitive advantage when competing in a single
industry or product market.
Strategic
positioning requires that managers address strategic trade-offs that arise between value and cost, because
higher value tends to go along with higher cost.
Differentiation
and cost leadership are distinct strategic positions.
Besides
selecting an appropriate strategic position, managers must also define the
scope of competition—whether
to pursue a specific market niche or go after the broader market.
The relationship between value drivers and differentiation strategy.
The goal of a differentiation
strategy is to increase the perceived value of goods and services so that customers will pay a higher
price for additional features.
In a
differentiation strategy, the focus of competition is on value-enhancing
attributes and features, while controlling costs.
Some
of the unique value drivers managers can manipulate are product features, customer service, customization, and
complements.
Value
drivers contribute to competitive advantage only if their increase in value
creation (ΔV) exceeds
the increase in costs (ΔC).
The relationship between cost drivers and the cost-leadership strategy.
The goal of a
cost-leadership strategy is to reduce the firm’s cost below that of its competitors.
In a
cost-leadership strategy, the focus of competition is achieving the lowest
possible cost position, which allows the firm to offer the lowest price while maintaining acceptable value.
Some
of the unique cost drivers that managers can manipulate are the cost of input factors,
economies of scale,
and learning- and experience-curve effects.
No
matter how low the price, if there is no acceptable value proposition, the
product or service will not sell.
Assess the
benefits and risks of cost-leadership and differentiation business strategies
vis-à-vis the five forces that shape competition.
The five forces model
helps managers use generic business strategies to protect themselves against the industry forces
that drive down profitability.
Differentiation
and cost-leadership strategies allow firms to carve out strong strategic positions, not only to protect
themselves against the five forces, but also to benefit from them in their quest for competitive advantage.
Exhibit
6.7 details the benefits and risks of each business strategy.
Evaluate value
and cost drivers that may allow a firm to pursue an integration strategy.
To address the
trade-offs between differentiation and cost leadership at the business level, managers may leverage quality, economies
of scope, innovation,
and the firm’s structure, culture, and routines.
The
trade-offs between differentiation and low cost can be addressed either at the
business level or at
the corporate level.
Why it is
difficult to succeed at an integration strategy.
A successful
integration strategy requires that trade-offs between differentiation and low cost be reconciled.
Integration
strategy often is difficult because the two distinct strategic positions require internal value chain activities that
are fundamentally different from one another.
When
firms fail to resolve strategic trade-offs between differentiation and cost, they
end up being
“stuck in the middle.” They then succeed at neither strategy, leading to a
competitive disadvantage.
Evaluate the
dynamics of competitive positioning.
The productivity
frontier represents a set of best-in-class strategic positions the firm can take relating to value creation and low cost at
a given point in time.
Reaching
the productivity frontier enhances the likelihood of obtaining a competitive advantage.
Not
reaching the productivity frontier implies competitive disadvantage if other firms are
positioned at the productivity frontier.
Strategic
positions need to change over time as the environment changes.
Comments
Post a Comment