Imperfect
competition is where the assumptions of perfect competition
are dropped and firms have some degree of market power.
Having market power means firms behaviour may be different to
that which operates under competitive conditions.
At the extreme of imperfect competition is monopoly.
A monopoly is a firm that is the sole seller in its market. A monopoly
arises when a single firm owns a key resource, when the government gives a firm the exclusive
right to produce a good, or when a single firm can supply the entire market at a
smaller cost than many firms could.
Because a monopoly is the sole producer in its market, it faces a
downward sloping demand curve for its product. When a monopoly increases production by 1 unit,
it causes the price of its good to fall, which reduces the amount of
revenue earned on all units produced. As a result, a
monopoly’s marginal revenue is always below the price of its good.
Like a competitive firm, a monopoly firm maximizes profit by producing
the quantity at which marginal revenue equals marginal cost. The monopoly then chooses the
price at which that quantity is demanded. Unlike a competitive firm, a monopoly
firm’s price exceeds its marginal revenue, so its price
exceeds marginal cost.
A monopolist’s profit-maximizing level of output is below the level that
maximizes the sum of consumer and producer surplus. That is, when the monopoly
charges a price above marginal cost, some consumers who value the good more than its cost of
production do not buy it. As a result, monopoly causes
deadweight losses.
Policy makers can respond to the inefficiency of monopoly behaviour in
four ways. They can use competition law to try to make the industry more competitive. They can
regulate the prices that the monopoly charges. They can turn the monopolist
into a government-run enterprise. Or, if the market failure is deemed small compared
to the inevitable imperfections of policies, they can do nothing at all.
Monopolists often can raise their profits by charging different
prices for the same good based on a buyer’s willingness to pay. This
practice of price discrimination can raise economic
welfare by getting the good to some consumers who otherwise
would not buy it. In the extreme case of perfect price
discrimination, the deadweight losses of monopoly are
completely eliminated. More generally, when price discrimination is imperfect,
it can either raise or lower welfare compared to the outcome with a single
monopoly price.
Comments
Post a Comment