This chapter discussed
the roles of MNEs for economic growth; the stages of globalization; why, where,
and how companies go global; four strategies MNEs use to navigate between cost
reductions and local responsiveness; and national competitive advantage.
Globalization,
multinational enterprise (MNE), foreign direct investment (FDI), and global
strategy.
Globalization involves
closer integration and exchange between different countries and peoples worldwide, made possible by
factors such as falling trade and investment barriers, advances in telecommunications, and reductions in
transportation costs.
A
multinational enterprise (MNE) deploys resources and capabilities to procure, produce, and distribute goods and
services in at least two countries.
Many
MNEs are more than 50 percent globalized; they receive the majority of their revenues from countries other than their
home country.
Product,
service, and capital markets are more globalized than labor markets. The level of everyday activities is roughly 10 to
25 percent integrated, and thus semi-globalized.
Foreign
direct investment (FDI) denotes a firm’s investments in value chain activities abroad.
Why companies compete abroad, and evaluate the advantages and disadvantages
of a global strategy.
Companies expand
beyond their home market if the benefits outweigh the risks.
Advantages
to competing internationally include gaining access to a larger market, gaining access to low-cost input factors,
and developing new competencies.
Disadvantages
to competing internationally include the liability of foreignness, the possible loss of reputation, and the
possible loss of intellectual capital.
Applying the CAGE distance framework to explain which countries MNEs enter.
Most of the costs and
risks involved in expanding beyond the domestic market are created by distance.
The
CAGE distance framework determines the relative distance between home and
foreign target country along four dimensions:
cultural distance, administrative and political distance, geographic distance, and economic
distance.
Comparing and
contrast the different options MNEs have to enter foreign markets.
The strategist has the
following foreign entry modes available: exporting, strategic alliances (licensing for products, franchising for
services), joint venture, and subsidiary (acquisition or greenfield).
Higher
levels of control, and thus a greater protection of IP and a lower likelihood
of any loss in
reputation, go along with more investmentintensive foreign entry modes such as
acquisitions or
greenfield plants.
Applying the
integration-responsiveness framework to evaluate the four different strategies
MNEs can pursue when
competing globally.
To navigate between
the competing pressures of cost reductions and local responsiveness, MNEs have four strategy options: international,
multidomestic, global-standardization, and transnational.
An
international strategy leverages home-based core competencies into foreign markets,
primarily through
exports. It is useful when the MNE faces low pressures for both local responsiveness and cost reductions.
A
multidomestic strategy attempts to maximize local responsiveness in the face of low
pressure for
cost reductions. It is costly and inefficient because it requires the duplication of
key business functions
in multiple countries.
A
global-standardization strategy seeks to reap economies of scale and location by
pursuing a global
division of labor based on wherever bestof-class capabilities reside at the
lowest cost. It involves
little or No. local
responsiveness.
A
transnational strategy attempts to combine the high local responsiveness of a
localization strategy with the lowest cost position attainable from a global-standardization strategy. It
also aims to benefit
from global learning. Although appealing, it is difficult to implement due to the organizational complexities involved.
Applying
Porter’s diamond framework to explain why certain industries are more
competitive in specific nations than
in others.
National competitive
advantage, or world leadership in specific industries, is created rather than inherited.
Four
interrelated factors explain national competitive advantage: (1) factor conditions, (2) demand conditions, (3) competitive intensity in a focal industry, and (4)
related and supporting industries/complementors.
Even in a
more globalized world, the basis for competitive advantage is often
local.
Comments
Post a Comment