This chapter defined
corporate strategy and then looked at two fundamental corporate strategy
topics—vertical integration and diversification.
Defining
corporate strategy and describe the three dimensions along which it is assessed.
Corporate strategy
addresses “where to compete.” Business strategy addresses “how to compete.”.
Corporate
strategy concerns the boundaries of the firm along three dimensions: (1) industry value chain, (2) products and services, and (3)
geography (regional, national, or global markets).
To
gain and sustain competitive advantage, any corporate strategy must support and
strengthen a firm’s
strategic position, regardless of whether it is a differentiation, cost-leadership, or
integration strategy.
Different options firms have to organize economic activity.
Transaction cost
economics help managers decide what activities to do in-house (“make”) versus what services and products to obtain from
the external
market (“buy”).
When
the costs to pursue an activity in-house are less than the costs of transacting in the
market (Cin-house ‹ Cmarket), then the firm
should vertically integrate.
Principal–agent
problems and information asymmetries can lead to market failures, and thus
situations where
internalizing the activity is preferred.
A
principal–agent problem arises when an agent performing activities on behalf of a
principal pursues his
or her own interests.
Information
asymmetries arise when one party is more informed than another because of the possession of private information.
Moving
from less integrated to more fully integrated forms of transacting, alternatives include short-term contracts, strategic
alliances (including
long-term contracts, equity alliances, and joint ventures), and
parent–subsidiary relationships.
Two types of vertical integration along the industry value chain: backward
and forward vertical integration.
Vertical integration
denotes a firm’s value added—what percentage of a firm’s sales is generated by the firm within its boundaries.
Industry
value chains (vertical value chains) depict the transformation of raw materials into finished goods and services.
Each stage typically represents a distinct industry in which a number of different firms are
competing.
Backward
vertical integration involves moving ownership of activities upstream nearer to the originating (inputs) point of the
industry value chain.
Forward
vertical integration involves moving ownership of activities closer to the end (customer) point of the
value chain.
Benefits and
risks of vertical integration.
Benefits of vertical
integration include securing critical supplies and distribution channels, lowering costs, improving quality,
facilitating scheduling and planning, and facilitating investments in specialized assets.
Risks
of vertical integration include increasing costs, reducing quality, reducing
flexibility, and increasing
the potential for legal repercussions.
Alternatives
to vertical integration.
Taper integration is a
strategy in which a firm is backwardly integrated but also relies on outsidemarket firms for
some of its supplies, and/or is forwardly integrated but also relies on outsidemarket firms for some if its distribution.
Strategic
outsourcing involves moving one or more value chain activities outside the firm’s boundaries to other firms in the industry value chain. Off-shoring is the
outsourcing of activities outside the home country.
Different types of corporate diversification.
A single-business firm
derives 95 percent or more of its revenues from one business.
A
dominant-business firm derives between 70 and 95 percent of its revenues from a single business, but pursues at
least one other business activity.
A
firm follows a related diversification strategy when it derives less than 70 percent of
its revenues from a single business activity, but obtains revenues from other lines of business
that are linked
to the primary business activity. Choices within a related diversification strategy can be related-constrained or
related-linked.
A
firm follows an unrelated diversification strategy when less than 70 percent of
its revenues come
from a single
business, and there are few, if any, linkages among its businesses.
Apply the core
competence– market matrix to derive different diversification strategies.
When applying an
existing/new dimension to core competencies and markets, four quadrants emerge, as depicted in Exhibit 8.8.
The
lower-left quadrant combines existing core competencies with existing markets. Here,
managers need to
come up with ideas of how to leverage existing core competencies to improve
their current
market position.
The
lower-right quadrant combines existing core competencies with new market
opportunities. Here,
managers need to think about how to redeploy and recombine existing core
competencies to compete
in future markets.
The
upper-left quadrant combines new core competencies with existing market opportunities. Here, managers must come up with
strategic initiatives
of how to build new core competencies to protect and extend the firm’s current market position.
The
upper-right quadrant combines new core competencies with new market opportunities. This is likely the most challenging diversification strategy because it requires
building new core competencies
to create and
compete in future markets.
When a
diversification strategy creates a competitive advantage and when it does not.
The
diversification-performance relationship is a function of the underlying type of
diversification.
The
relationship between the type of diversification and overall firm performance
takes on the shape
of an inverted
U (see Exhibit 8.9 ).
Unrelated
diversification often results in a diversification discount: the stock price of
such highly diversified
firms is valued at less than the sum of their individual business units.
Related
diversification often results in a diversification premium: the stock price of related-diversification firms is valued
at greater than
the sum of their individual business units.
In
the BCG matrix, the corporation is viewed as a portfolio of businesses, much like a portfolio of stocks in finance (see Exhibit 8.11 ). The individual SBUs are
evaluated according to relative market share and the speed of market growth, and are plotted using one of four
categories: dog, cash cow, star, and question mark. Each category warrants a different
investment strategy.
Both
low levels and high levels of diversification are generally associated with lower
overall performance, while moderate levels of diversification are associated with higher firm
performance.
Comments
Post a Comment