This chapter discussed
various aspects of innovation and entrepreneurship as a business-level strategy.
The four-step
innovation process from idea to imitation.
Innovation describes
the discovery and development of new knowledge in a four-step process captured in the 4-I’s: idea,
invention, innovation, and imitation.
The
innovation process begins with an idea.
An
invention describes the transformation of an idea into a new product or process, or
the modification and
recombination of existing ones.
Innovation
concerns the commercialization of an invention by entrepreneurs (within existing companies or new ventures).
If an
innovation is successful in the marketplace, competitors will attempt to imitate it.
Apply strategic management concepts to entrepreneurship and innovation.
Entrepreneurship
describes the process by which change agents undertake economic risk to innovate—to create new products,
processes, and sometimes
new organizations.
Strategic
entrepreneurship describes the pursuit of innovation using tools and concepts from strategic management.
Social
entrepreneurship describes the pursuit of social goals by using entrepreneurship. Social entrepreneurs use a triple-bottom-line
approach to assess
performance.
The competitive implications of different stages in the industry life cycle.
Innovations frequently
lead to the birth of new industries.
Industries
generally follow a predictable industry life cycle, with five distinct stages: introduction, growth, shakeout, maturity,
and decline.
Exhibit
7.9 details features and strategic implications of the industry life cycle.
Strategic
implications of the crossing-the-chasm framework.
The core argument of
the crossing-the-chasm framework is that each stage of the industry life cycle is dominated by a different customer group, which responds differently to
a new technological innovation.
There
exists a significant difference between the customer groups that enter early during the introductory stage of the industry life
cycle and customers
that enter later during the growth stage.
This
distinct difference between customer groups leads to a big gulf or chasm which
companies and their
innovations frequently fall into.
To
overcome the chasm, managers need to formulate a business strategy guided by
the “who-whatwhy-and-how” questions of competition.
Different
types of innovations in the markets-and-technology framework.
Four types of
innovation emerge when applying the existing versus new dimensions of technology and markets: incremental,
radical, architectural, and disruptive innovations (see Exhibit 7.10 ).
An
incremental innovation squarely builds on an established knowledge base, and steadily improves an existing product or service
offering (existing
market / existing technology).
A
radical innovation draws on novel methods or materials, is derived either from an
entirely different knowledge base or from the recombination of the existing knowledge base with a new
stream of knowledge
(new market / new technology).
An
architectural innovation is an embodied new product in which known components, based
on existing
technologies, are reconfigured in a novel way to attack new markets (new market / existing technology).
A
disruptive innovation is an innovation that leverages new technologies to attack
existing markets
from the
bottom up (existing market / new technology).
The long-tail
concept and derive its strategic implications.
Firms digitize their
offerings to leverage the Internet as a disruptive force.
The
long tail describes a business model in which companies can obtain a significant part
of their revenues by selling a small number of
units from among
almost unlimited choices.
Compare and
contrast closed and open innovation.
Closed innovation is a
framework for R&D that proposes impenetrable firm boundaries. Key to success in the closed innovation model is
that the firm
discovers, develops, and commercializes new products internally.
Open
innovation is a framework for R&D that proposes permeable firm boundaries to
allow a firm
to benefit not only from internal ideas and inventions, but also from external ones.
The sharing
goes both ways: some external ideas and inventions are in-sourced while others are spun-out.
Exhibit
7.14 compares and contrasts principles of closed and open innovation.
Comments
Post a Comment