This chapter discussed
two mechanisms of corporatelevel strategy (acquisitions and alliances).
Mergers and
acquisitions, and why firms would use either as a vehicle for corporate strategy.
A merger describes the
joining of two independent companies to form a combined entity.
An
acquisition describes the purchase or takeover of one company by another. It can be
friendly or hostile.
Although
there is a distinction between mergers and acquisitions, many observers simply
use the
umbrella term
“mergers and acquisitions,” or M&A.
Firms
can use M&A activity for competitive advantage when they possess a superior relational capability, which is often
built on superior alliance management capability.
Horizontal integration and evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of
this corporate-level strategy.
Horizontal integration
is the process of merging
with competitors, leading to industry consolidation.
As a
corporate strategy, firms use horizontal integration to (1) reduce competitive intensity, (2) lower costs, and (3)
increase differentiation.
Why firms engage in acquisitions.
Firms engage in
acquisitions to (1) access new markets and distributions channels, (2) gain access to a new capability or competency, and (3) preempt rivals.
Evaluate
whether mergers and acquisitions lead to competitive advantage.
Most mergers and
acquisitions destroy shareholder value because anticipated synergies never materialize.
If
there is any value creation in M&A, it generally accrues to the
shareholders of the firm that is taken over (the acquiree), because acquirers often pay a premium when buying the
target company.
Mergers
and acquisitions are a popular vehicle for corporate-level strategy implementation
for three reasons:
(1) because of principal–agent problems, (2) the desire to overcome competitive disadvantage, and (3) the quest for
superior acquisition and integration capability.
Strategic
alliances, and why they are important corporate strategy vehicles and why firms
enter into them.
Strategic alliances
have the goal of sharing knowledge, resources, and capabilities in order to develop processes, products,
or services.
An
alliance qualifies as strategic if it has the potential to affect a firm’s competitive
advantage by
increasing value and/or lowering costs.
The
most common reasons why firms enter alliances are to (1) strengthen competitive position, (2) enter new markets, (3) hedge
against uncertainty,
(4) access critical complementary resources, and (5) learn new capabilities.
Three alliance
governance mechanisms and evaluate their pros and cons.
Alliances can be
governed by the following mechanisms: contractual agreements for non-equity alliances, equity alliances,
and joint ventures.
Exhibit
9.2 presents the pros and cons of each alliance governance mechanism.
The three
phases of alliance management and how an alliance management capability can
lead to a competitive
advantage.
An alliance management
capability can be a source of competitive advantage.
An
alliance management capability consists of a firm’s ability to effectively manage
three alliancerelated tasks concurrently: (1) partner selection and alliance formation, (2) alliance
design and governance,
and (3)
post-formation alliance management.
Firms
build a superior alliance management capability through “learning-by-doing” and
by establishing
a dedicated alliance function.
The
build-borrow-or-buy framework to guide corporate strategy.
The
build-borrow-or-buy framework provides a conceptual model that aids strategists in deciding whether to pursue internal
development (build), enter a contract arrangement or strategic alliance (borrow), or acquire new
resources, capabilities, and competencies (buy).
Firms
that are able to learn how to select the right pathways to obtain new resources are more
likely to
gain and sustain a competitive advantage.
Comments
Post a Comment